June 07, 2005
ok i know my reders arnt rel technicel (wel one of em miaght be but not teh othar one) so ill kep this metephorecal.
so imagine two twelve rigng circuasas mutuly adjacent. that is to say ech is ajacant to teh othar1. an the trapeez artistes in echa of the twalve rigns in ach tent are tharowign clowns back an froth to the othar tent. but thares no set asociation of a givan rign in one curcus with one in the other: ring 5 in circus A might tharow a calown to rign zero in cursos B one time, but mabe the next clown they thrrow might be to ring 7 er whatever. whoevers free at the momant. its all asynchronous.
so keep this up for a few hunderad or as many as two thosand or so clowan-throws an its all fine — but than at some arbitrary point it turns wierd an some a the clowns start getin flang awry an geting et by the lions an it all turns to crap.
an i dont know why.
yeh the tents are cloasd. asume their throwan em thruohg a tunel. ok fine the metephars imperfact.
1 ajacancy beign comutative as u must know or u wuldnt be here.
Links to this post:
ill nail it tomora. right batewean its pigy litl ratfaced eyes!
You shouldn't say things like that to Bogol. He tends to believe people love him for his mnid.