September 13, 2006
garantueed to be teh wrost joke you endure this year!!
jeez now theyyre spamign me with cures for idempotence.
uuppdaaet!
our reedar ottery hodary unerstans teh implacations!
Even if you're not idempotent, you might be in need of a unary operation.
Comments:
Even if you're not idempotent, you might be in need of a unary operation.
# posted by 
: 9/13/2006 10:07:00 AM
: 9/13/2006 10:07:00 AM
Hyeh hyeh hyeh.
You might expect that an imaginary unit would have to be idempotent, but in fact it's quintipotent.
You might expect that an imaginary unit would have to be idempotent, but in fact it's quintipotent.
AND I am reading your other blog slavishly. They make you sign up to leave comments, and I hate signing up. But I read and read.
They say unary operations can make you blind, in the long run. Or give you hairy palms. Dyadic predictaes have been known to stave off idempotence.
a.ah. - duuude!
porjj - i looked up 'quintipotent' an its not the're. i haop ur nto tryina lower hte tone of my bolg here by makingn stuff up. but now 'slavashly' now — thahts the kinda reader im lookign for here. glad ta hear it.
d.a. - er. yeah!
porjj - i looked up 'quintipotent' an its not the're. i haop ur nto tryina lower hte tone of my bolg here by makingn stuff up. but now 'slavashly' now — thahts the kinda reader im lookign for here. glad ta hear it.
d.a. - er. yeah!
Well I did kind of make it up. It's k-potent, where k = 5. I guess what I was groping for is something like, the more imaginary one's unit is, the less one is troubled by idempotence.
Post a Comment
<< Home
